๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐’๐บ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐: Rethinking Diabetes by Gary Taubes.
I’ll be honest. This is the third time I’ve tried to read this book and I still didn’t get through it. But since it’s written by the same person who wrote The Case Against Sugar and The Case for KETO I expect food and what people with diabetes “should” and “shouldn’t” eat fills the bulk of the book.
At any rate, I’ve only gotten through his telling of the early history of diabetes care, which centers on Banting and his contemporaries. And two things struck me in its telling.
1๏ธโฃ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ. There were no double-blind studies conducted when insulin was discovered. That wasn’t a thing yet. There were case notes for a handful of patients who managed to get themselves to one of the few hospitals where one of the self-appointed primary investigators practiced medicine.
And
2๏ธโฃ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐น๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฎ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ด๐ป๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐. Granted, before insulin therapy a diabetes diagnosis was a death sentence. You were going to die from it, it was just a question of how soon. But even with all the improvements in treatments and technology the tone remains charged with anger, fear, and shame.
I can still hear the echoes of these early experiences in so many ways. In how diabetes is talked about. The assumptions people make when they hear the word diabetes. The treatments that get approved and promoted. The approaches that are ignored or sidelined.
You may ask, so what? To which I say, while our past does not equal our future it does influence how we move ahead. My hope is that we stay curious and open to new information and not be limited by what we think we already know.
#DiabetesAwarenessMonth #diabetes #WorldDiabetesDay
Originally published on LinkedIn.